Yes but it means if they've been losing than they were a higher MMR before and could technically be better than you.
For me it tends to be balanced so maybe they just got the shit end of a stick unluckily.
Maybe for unranked matches, this method could work. But for ranked, numbers are numbers. Considering Source 2's ability to track matches, I don't see why this methodology couldn't be implemented.
When i get a winning streak on valve starts to put me with the most tilted players, my entire team has won like 2 games out of 10-20 games
FoRcEd 50% WiNrAtE
hIdDeN pOoL
TeAmMaTeS hOlD mE bAcK
Mm Is RiGgEd
actually every time i see anyone postng this kind of shit, i automatically assume this person has sub 90 IQ irl and no education/no ability to think critically. and thats not a joke.
Matchmaking is rigged. It may not be as obvious on an established account with high behavior score, but just make a smurf and it's obvious. The way you're matched exclusively with other smurfs for first ~50 games is not a coincidence. When you get an intentional feeder on your team after dodging a game, it's not a coincidence. When you get 10, 20, 30 games in a row, all on Radiant/Dire or all of them with stacks — it's not a coincidence.
i basically won a match, felt great about myself. simplest bet on my existence.
i then checked out yesteryear video games of every one of the avid gamers. yea dropping crew had largely shed their preceding video games, and we had generally been successful all of our prior video games.
i feel that valve need to match people that are taking part in poorly within the identical recreation, at the same time as on each and every facet. this genuinely is so both teams have ppl equally on tilt, while folks who was simply just playing perfectly shd be matched up with other people who'd equally been obtaining a good time.
effectively. it's possible valve is punishing folks gentlemen for acquiring undesirable behavior score
I get great games on this account when I bother playing on it, but my smurf is just cursed. I'm not talking about bad players, I'm talking about intentional feeders and/or <1 KDA supports and/or stacks in every game.
wao woa woa guys wtf are u all saying. my point is that ifu play against a team of tilted players its hardly fair, even with same rating.
ＦｏＲｃＥｄ ５０％ ＷｉＮｒＡｔＥ = Bullshit
ｈＩｄＤｅＮ ｐＯｏＬ = Bullshit
ＴｅＡｍＭａＴｅＳ ｈＯｌＤ ｍＥ ｂＡｃＫ = Sometimes it's true
Ｍｍ Ｉｓ ＲｉＧｇＥｄ = Bullshit
When someone is picking shit or playing tilted or drunk or w/e, you can play well and still lose, so it has nothing to do with you sometimes. If you want to win those kinda games you need to be way ahead of them, not by a little bit, but with time everyone get's where they belong.
For real @beefballs. I saw the same thing many times, the team that wins has its members on winning spree, and the team that looses has its members on loosing spree. Even if they are the same bracket/mmr. Only braindead people refuse to accept that mm-system is screwed...
In my smurfs I still get tilting hormonalt 12 year olds and I still have a good chance of winning. Its unfair to call the game rigged though based on your idea on this, although you may actually have a point. LmFao who Fucking Careas anyWayp
发表评论请登录
i just won a match, felt pretty good about myself. easiest game of my life.
then i looked at the past games of all the players. yea losing team had mostly lost their previous games, and our team had mostly been winning all our previous games.
i think that valve should match people who are playing badly in the same game, and on both sides. this is so both teams have ppl equally on tilt, while people who had been playing well shd be matched with others who had equally been having a good time.
well. maybe valve is punishing those guys for having bad behaviour score