General Discussion

General DiscussionRoshan vs enemy ancient?(Decision making)

Roshan vs enemy ancient?(Decision making) in General Discussion
despair

    I had this one game as anti mage. https://www.dotabuff.com/matches/3192042614
    2 enemies were dead with no bb, and we were all alive, and they got almost all of our towers and barracks, and they had no middle towers left including middle barracks, but they chose to do roshan instead, by the time they were doing roshan, the enemies spawned and killed our TA and mirana and treant, and they had no bb, i was forced to def our base with treant dying outside of the base, i died too but bought back alone.
    WOULD you rather do roshan first or risk to destroy their lone ancient when 3 enemy heroes are alive but all of ur teammates are alive?
    I think that proper decision making is what most players lack.

    ywn

      would you rather win the game, or have an aegis and a cheese

      disgusting weebs

        id rather have 2 number 9s with cheese

        Desolate

          u should hve push to t 4 make them force bb if they dont have end game if have go back rosh ward roshpit wait kill and end game

          Jacked

            sometimes 3 heroes can hold off long enough for the rest to respawn and then you'd be caught in a bad spot. it really depends

            Cookie

              depends on how hungry you are

              despair

                I dont think that those 3 heroes can defend, and timbersaw and shaman had no bb as they used it on the past clash, whenever we try to push only timber is the nuisance as he always cut the creep waves, we won a clash and timber and shaman died, and almost halfway done pushing mid, their final tier 4 tower is only 50 health, but our TA went to do rs, and i said that rs is harder to kill than their ancient.